https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index en-au 5 Expert interpretation of bitemark injuries: a contemporary qualitative study https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:18984 10 years) tended to agree with each other less than those who had 10 years or less experience in forensic odontology. The differences in opinions can be at least partly accounted for by the inconsistent nature of approaches used by different practitioners in assessing bitemark evidence. The results of this study indicate that more definitive guidelines as to the assessment of bitemarks as patterned injuries should be developed to ensure the highest possible level of practitioner agreement.]]> Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:58:50 AEDT ]]> Reality bites: a ten-year retrospective analysis of bitemark casework in Australia https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:25720 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:33:30 AEDT ]]>